Path: utzoo!mnetor!geac!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!umigw!mthvax!aem
From: aem@mthvax.cs.miami.edu (a.e.mossberg)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Why I voted against rec.food.recipes (was Re: CALL FOR VOTES: rec.food.recipes)
Keywords: vote recipes food cooking
Message-ID: <1990Feb28.182946.9650@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
Date: 28 Feb 90 18:29:46 GMT
References: <1990Feb19.000030.680@mthvax.cs.miami.edu> <1990Feb28.160408.28672@relay.nswc.navy.mil>
Reply-To: aem@Mthvax.CS.Miami.Edu
Organization: U of Miami Dept. of Math. and Computer Science, Coral Gables, FL 33124
Lines: 18

In article <1990Feb28.160408.28672@relay.nswc.navy.mil> dsill@ophiuchi.nswc.navy.mil (Dave Sill) writes:

>I think rec.food.recipes should be for recipes *and recipe requests*.
>Why should someone interested only in posting and saving recipes be
>required to read rec.food.cooking and rec.food.veg to get recipe
>requests?  Why should someone who wants a recipe have to post their
>request in one group and look for the recipes in another?


I'm easy. If people want recipe requests there too that's fine with me.

aem


-- 
a.e.mossberg / aem@mthvax.cs.miami.edu / aem@umiami.BITNET / Pahayokee Bioregion
No matter whether th' constitution follows th' flag or not, th' supreme coort 
follows th' eliction returns.				- Finley Peter Dunne