Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!mejac!rissa
From: rissa@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Patricia O Tuama)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Various topics
Message-ID: <30@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Date: 1 Mar 90 02:37:15 GMT
Followup-To: news.groups.paranoia.strikes.deep
Organization: Lone Star Cafe
Lines: 34

In article <90056.104623NMBCU@CUNYVM.BITNET> NMBCU@CUNYVM writes:
[long, strange article mostly deleted]

My goodness gracious, Nelson, where did all that come from?  The
reason I think you're biased is because you were rather vocal dur-
ing the aquaria discussion last fall.  Anyone who posted more than
a couple of articles on this discussion is probably biased in one 
direction or another and is therefore, an unsuitable candidate for 
vote-taker.  Especially someone who is now actively campaigning to
get the job.

>					Like for example, whats makes
>    you think I think you're biased. 

Nelson, what are you talking about?  When did I say you think I'm 
biased?  Look, this is all I wrote:

	In article <_DW17VCxds8@ficc.uu.net> jeffd@ficc.uu.net (Jeff Daiell) writes:
	>idea.   But we need to pick the proverbial innocent bystander
	>to count the votes (i.e., Richard, Peter, Oleg, me, Trish, and
	>Chuq would be prima facie ineligible).

	Add to that list Nelson Broat and K*nt Dolan.
				Message-ID: <18025@rpp386.cactus.org>

How on earth did you take this simple sentence and manage to come
up with all that weird stuff you wrote accusing me of all sorts of
bizarre things?


>    So go ahead Trish, flame away. Isn't that what you want anyway?

Not particularily, no.  Watching you flame yourself in my name is
far more amusing than anything I could say about you.