Xref: utzoo news.groups:18264 alt.config:1514
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!mejac!rissa
From: rissa@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Patricia O Tuama)
Newsgroups: news.groups,alt.config
Subject: Re: Various topics
Message-ID: <31@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Date: 1 Mar 90 02:44:56 GMT
Organization: Lone Star Cafe
Lines: 30

In article <CR_+.Z-@splut.conmicro.com> jay@splut.conmicro.com (Jay "you ignorant splut!" Maynard) writes:
>Finally, for the Sycophant(tm) Sweetheart, Patricia O Tuama:

Ahhhhh, how nice.  Hey, Richard, did you see this?  

>Which one are you referencing, pray tell?

Oh, I'm sorry, I thought you read news.groups on a regular basis.
Those of us who do know I was referring to soc.religion.eastern 
which started off as a talk group and was switched to a soc group 
in order to get better distribution.  The vote on this just ended
a week ago, Jay.  Where have you been?

>BTW, does this mean you're back to being willing to talk about
>sci.aquaria? 

No, it doesn't, dear.

I would like to know, however, why you're being such a hypocrite
about this business with distribution.  Your primary argument 
turns on the notion that s.a is fraudulent because it "cheats" 
unsuspecting sysadmins by causing them to pay for a rec group as 
part of the sci hierarchy.  I would like to know why you're not 
just as concerned about unsuspecting sysadmins having to pay for 
a talk group as part of the soc hierarchy.

				              .
				t r i s h a   o t u a m a
			  just another Sycophant(tm) Sweetheart
				  on the Usenet of Life