Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!dgp.toronto.edu!doc
Newsgroups: ont.singles
From: doc@dgp.toronto.edu (Blaine Price)
Subject: Re: BIMS, TROLLIPS, BABES : Women of Our Time
Message-ID: <1990Feb27.002117.18215@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>
References: <5093.25e9b314@uwovax.uwo.ca>
Date: 27 Feb 90 05:21:17 GMT
Lines: 37

4223_5114@uwovax.uwo.ca writes:
>Well I must agree with the spirit of the classifications, if not the exact
>terminology.  I prefer : BIMS, TROLLIPS, and BABES.

>1) BIMS (Short for Bimbo).  Bims are very stupid, and usually can be coerced
>into just about anything (sexual or otherwise).  These chicks are just plain
							^^^^^^
>simple, and blatently shallow.  Perhaps the personification of "Barbie" will
>suffice.  And don't be lulled into the easy assumption that Bims are
>"good-looking", because plenty of Bims are real ugly.

>2) TROLLIPS (aka Sluts, Harlots).  These chicks aren't stupid, but they can be. 
>Where you can coerce a bim into sex, a TROLLIP will usually take the
>initiative.  This may seem appealing to some, but when this chick has been with
							     ^^^^^
>five or six of your friends, it's time to hit the road.

>3) BABES (aka the Real Thing) Babes are the cream of the crop.  Babes are
>usually HOT (not solely in the physical sense either, I can think of lots of
>babes that are really quite ugly, but this in no way detracts from their
>attractiveness).  Babes are cool in the sense that they are real people,
			     ^^^^
>ordinary perhaps, but unique in their own way.  

>It's hard to just label a chick when you first meet her, but after you
			   ^^^^^
>know her a while, It is pretty easy to classify the chick.
						     ^^^^^

It is with great trepidation that I respond to this truly intellectual missive,
but as the vocabulary is clearly an attempt at early 70s machoisms and the 
userid _appears_ to be that of an unnamed Waterloo undergrad (and almost all
Waterloo undergrads shouldn't have been old enough to form coherent senetences
in the early 70s), one reaches the conclusion that this is a joke posting
(or someone is trying to stir up shit).

						_doc