Path: utzoo!mnetor!geac!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!neat.cs.toronto.edu!gara
From: gara@theory.toronto.edu (Gara Pruesse)
Newsgroups: ont.singles
Subject: Re: BIMS, TROLLIPS, BABES : Women of Our Time
Summary: ^^^^^^^^          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Keywords: asinine, orthography
Message-ID: <90Feb27.102759est.6481@neat.cs.toronto.edu>
Date: 27 Feb 90 15:28:54 GMT
References: <5093.25e9b314@uwovax.uwo.ca>
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Lines: 21

In article <5093.25e9b314@uwovax.uwo.ca> 4223_5114@uwovax.uwo.ca writes:
>...
>Well I must agree with the spirit of the classifications, if not the exact
>terminology.  I prefer : BIMS, TROLLIPS, and BABES.
>
>1) BIMS (Short for Bimbo).  Bims are very stupid, and usually can be coerced
>...
>2) TROLLIPS (aka Sluts, Harlots).  These chicks aren't stupid, but they can be.
    ^^^^^^^^
>Where you can coerce a bim into sex, a TROLLIP will usually take the
...
>3) BABES (aka the Real Thing) Babes are the cream of the crop.  Babes are

Blaine's posting notwithstanding, I think the most glaring anachronism
in the above posting is the use of the word "trollop" (misspelled, of course).  
I associate it with the 19th century.

May I add that I find the 4223_5114's posting offensive.  Was it posted to 
bait women?  And people used to wonder why women didn't post here much...

-gara