Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!math.lsa.umich.edu!emv From: ehrlich@cs.psu.edu (Daniel Ehrlich) Newsgroups: comp.archives Subject: [comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt] Re: hc2.1y and dbx Message-ID: <11227@stag.math.lsa.umich.edu> Date: 2 Mar 90 02:57:15 GMT Sender: news@math.lsa.umich.edu Reply-To: ehrlich@cs.psu.edu (Daniel Ehrlich) Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt Lines: 26 Approved: emv@math.lsa.umich.edu (Edward Vielmetti) Archive-name: ibm-rt-fixes/01-Mar-90 Original-posting-by: ehrlich@cs.psu.edu (Daniel Ehrlich) Original-subject: Re: hc2.1y and dbx Archive-site: bikini.cis.ufl.edu [128.227.224.1] Archive-directory: pub/ibm-fixes Reposted-by: emv@math.lsa.umich.edu (Edward Vielmetti) In article <1990Feb27.225719.1443@terminator.cc.umich.edu> ric@rioja.ifs.umich.edu (Richard Campbell) writes: Richard> At the Washington Usenix RT/AOS4.3 bof, it Richard> was mentioned that hc2.1y was in very good shape Richard> and that it worked well with dbx. Richard> Now that we have hc2.1y, we're not exactly seeing Richard> wonderfullness on the dbx front. Should we? Or do we Richard> need to pick up a new dbx? Which DBX are you using? The dbx that came with the Sep/Dec 88 release or the one issued by Eric Brunner as patch V1.15 parts 1 through 5? The dbx that came originaly was never very useful. The new version is archived on the host bikini.cis.ufl.edu [128.227.224.1] in the directory pub/ibm-rt-fixes. -- Dan Ehrlich Voice: +1 814 863 1142 FAX: +1 814 865 3176