Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!decwrl!crltrx!decvax!ima!esegue!compilers-sender
From: grunwald@foobar.Colorado.EDU (Dirk Grunwald)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Subject: Re: Compiler with adjustable parsers
Keywords: parse,lisp
Message-ID: <1990Mar3.062105.25927@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us>
Date: 3 Mar 90 06:21:05 GMT
Sender: compilers-sender@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us
Reply-To: Dirk Grunwald <grunwald@foobar.Colorado.EDU>
Organization: Compilers Central
Lines: 10
Approved: compilers@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us
Office: 6-1 EECR (303) 492-0452

Well, Scheme and Lisp let you do this using extend-syntax and
defmacro, respectively.

Also, wasn't there a language done at Harvard called Extensible
Language or EL or something like that?
[EL/1, see a subsequent message -John]
-- 
Send compilers articles to compilers@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us
{spdcc | ima | lotus}!esegue.  Meta-mail to compilers-request@esegue.
Please send responses to the author of the message, not the poster.