Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:10441 comp.databases:5117
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!mahendo!jplgodo!seila!dksfr!don
From: don@dksfr.UUCP (don kossman)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.databases
Subject: xenix 386, oracle, raw partitions
Summary: have you done it?
Keywords: xenix, oracle, wd1007v, ast, primus
Message-ID: <289@dksfr.UUCP>
Date: 6 Mar 90 17:08:38 GMT
Reply-To: don@seila.UUCP (don kossman)
Followup-To: comp.databases
Organization: SEI Information Technology, LA, CA
Lines: 19

environment:
   sco xenix 386, ast 386/25 with cache, wd1007v controller
   16 mb ram, 2 x primus esdi 750m (unformatted) drives
   excelan 405t ethernet package, oracle 5.1.17.x for xenix 386

we have been told by oracle to expect about a 30% performance gain by
using raw disk partitions instead of regular xenix files for the database
and before-image files.

the system is used exclusively as an oracle database server, clients
(about 10 386SX machines running xenix) connect to the server via
sqlnet/tcp-ip.

can someone who's tried both configurations in a similar environment
please comment?

-- 
Don Kossman, SEI Information Technology, Los Angeles
mahendo.jpl.nasa.gov!jplgodo!seila!don OR sun!suntzu!seila!don