Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: kaufman@neon.stanford.edu (Marc T. Kaufman) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Portable Office Phones Message-ID: <4613@accuvax.nwu.edu> Date: 1 Mar 90 17:20:43 GMT Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University Lines: 22 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 136, Message 6 of 7 In article <4536@accuvax.nwu.edu> John Higdon writes: >Who knows, maybe the next big Silicon Valley bombshell will be >revealed first on this group thanks to the popularity of the Merlin >cordless :-) Ant the Moderator replies: >[Moderator's Note: Even though cordless phones are not treated as >cellular phones where the prohibition against listening is concerned, >under FCC regulations you still do not have the lawful right to repeat >what you have heard, or acknowledge that you heard anything. Rules of >the FCC pertaining to overhearing radio transmissions not intended for >yourself still apply, including the part about not using what you have >heard for your personal gain. PT] Sure. And Mac The Knife only prints official press releases from Apple.... Marc Kaufman (kaufman@Neon.stanford.edu) [Auntie Moderator Notes a great deal of confusion on this point, as per the next message, whose author neglects an important distinction. PT