Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: cmoore@brl.mil (VLD/VMB)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Towns Split by LATA Lines
Message-ID: <4782@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 5 Mar 90 15:33:01 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 6
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 146, Message 4 of 9


I recall hearing of adjustments being made in the then-proposed
213/818 border to avoid splitting communities.  Notice that 201/908 is
currently still future.  But the situation you write of in
Massachusetts was on the 413/617 boundary (right?), until that part of
617 went into 508.