Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!fwi.uva.nl!kim!freek
From: freek@fwi.uva.nl (Freek Wiedijk)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: FREE
Message-ID: <468@fwi.uva.nl>
Date: 3 Mar 90 11:13:27 GMT
References: <2714@stl.stc.co.uk> <1990Feb27.155133.20341@druid.uucp> <16055@haddock.ima.isc.com> <1990Mar1.140829.17199@druid.uucp> <2353@dataio.Data-IO.COM>
Sender: news@fwi.uva.nl
Reply-To: freek@fwi.uva.nl (Freek Wiedijk)
Organization: Faculteit Wiskunde & Informatica, Universiteit van Amsterdam
Lines: 11

In article <2353@dataio.Data-IO.COM> bright@Data-IO.COM (Walter Bright) writes:
>And no, I don't care about machines where 0.0 and NULL are not 0 bit
>patterns. If someday I should be unfortunate enough to run across one,
>I'll worry about it then!

When you read this, don't you think the C community's cavalier attitude
on software reliability is horrible? :-)

--
Freek "the Pistol Major" Wiedijk                  Path: uunet!fwi.uva.nl!freek
#P:+/ = #+/P?*+/ = i<<*+/P?*+/ = +/i<<**P?*+/ = +/(i<<*P?)*+/ = +/+/(i<<*P?)**