Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!ukc!kl-cs!nott-cs!chelgraph!bill From: bill@chelgraph.CO.UK (bill davy) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: Chelgraph Patent Application Message-ID: <469@xchelsys.chelgraph.CO.UK> Date: 1 Mar 90 09:38:17 GMT Sender: root@cs.nott.ac.uk Reply-To: bill@chelgraph.CO.UK (bill davy) Organization: Chelgraph Ltd, Cheltenham, UK. Lines: 39 > > Path: chelgraph!nott-cs!ukc!mcsun!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!apple!voder!pyramid!leadsv!cberg > From: cberg@leadsv.UUCP (Charles R Berg) > Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript > Subject: Re: Chelgraph patent on compression... > Message-ID: <10100@leadsv.UUCP> > Date: 27 Feb 90 20:41:21 GMT > References: <8167@lindy.Stanford.EDU> <120@xchelsys.chelgraph.CO.UK> > Reply-To: cberg@leadsv.LEADS.LMSC.COM.UUCP (Charles R Berg) > Organization: LMSC-LEADS, Sunnyvale, Ca. > Lines: 7 > > In article <120@xchelsys.chelgraph.CO.UK> bill@xchelsys.UUCP (bill davy) > writes: > >Chelgraph has a patent on compression to/from disc for bitmap output > >devices. > > Would you care to elaborate on this? I mean, without revealing your > proprietary technology, what exactly have you patented? THIS REPLY IS ENTIRELY MY PERSONAL VIEW Very briefly, our British Patent Application No 8900368.5 "Bit Map Compression" observes that a given compression can be -guaranteed- by using some form of lossy compression, and hence lower speed and smaller disc drives (or other means etc) can be used; the invention is to apply this to bitmap compression for high resolution output, where the losses are not significant. The problem we face is to get realistic performance for typesetters, especially as we move into colour. The highest resolution we currently drive is 3048 dpi, and the bitmaps were getting kind of large. Frankly, I abhor patents; if you're smart enough to invent, then you should be smart enough to exploit (directly or indirectly). But we get hassled too (remember the Linotron 202 for example), and it would be nice to see the royalties flow in the other direction, for a change.