Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!ames!sparkyfs!zwicky From: zwicky@sparkyfs.istc.sri.com (Elizabeth Zwicky) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: Automatic posting v 2 Keywords: automatic posting Message-ID: <30250@sparkyfs.istc.sri.com> Date: 6 Mar 90 18:13:16 GMT References: <2879@ursa.UUCP> <18094@rpp386.cactus.org> <18096@rpp386.cactus.org> Reply-To: zwicky@stegosaur.itstd.sri.com.UUCP (Elizabeth Zwicky) Organization: SRI International, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Lines: 30 Personally, I think a frequently asked questions posting is a good idea. But if it's going to be this one, it's going to need a lot more than a few drafts. I started to write this as a brief reply, with the few form-based comments I had on the first few answers (for instance, it needs to be formatted to set off questions from answers; "high" needs to be spelled "high" everywhere, and not "hi"; there's no reason to say "the RED book" instead of "the Red Book"). Unfortunately, the further I got, the less happy I was. I'm willing to write off as unneccessary quibbling my feeling that the text is choppy. I'm not willing to write off referring to Ultrascript PC and NeWS without mentioning what they are and what machines they run on, or the gratuitous Adobe-bashing in that answer. Nor am I willing to write off an answer to the question "What is EPS?" that never actually answers the stated question! Or an answer to the speed question which in successive paragraphs suggests one character command abbreviations done as "\s {show} def" and then suggests using "bind def" instead of "def". Writing for people who don't know the topic you're writing on is tricky. You have to be correct, precise, and extremely explanatory. This document needs *much* more work and thought put into it. While Woody has provided the technical content, I don't think he has the skills required to write it up well. I really would like to avoid inserting myself into the middle of *any* argument in this newsgroup; on the other hand, I'm a compulsive fixer of bad writing. If I rewrite this sucker from scratch, am I going to find myself in the middle of a flame war, or will it actually be useful? Elizabeth