Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!TRANSARC.COM!Craig_Everhart
From: Craig_Everhart@TRANSARC.COM
Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers
Subject: Re: "X.400" articles with >To:, Message-Version:, etc
Message-ID: <gZwwrR70BwwOQMSnQv@transarc.com>
Date: 6 Mar 90 14:49:01 GMT
References: <10613@hoptoad.uucp>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Lines: 11

I don't think there's anything out-and-out illegal about what you quoted
in the gatewayed-from-X.400 header.  You may not *like* the
	>To:
and
	>From:
headers, but RFC822 says they're OK.  (Whether B-news likes them is
another matter, but that's a ``small matter of programming.'')  The two
additional IDs will doubtless be useful to you three years hence when
you're debugging your own installation of X.400.

		Craig