Xref: utzoo comp.misc:8375 comp.protocols.tcp-ip:10422
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!uunet!mcsun!prlbcom!lln-cs!sunbim!syteke!jim
From: jim@syteke.be (Jim Sanchez)
Newsgroups: comp.misc,comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: SLIP or PPP support (opinions wanted)
Message-ID: <765@syteke.be>
Date: 26 Feb 90 11:08:15 GMT
Reply-To: jim@syteke.UUCP (Jim Sanchez)
Followup-To: comp.misc
Organization: Hughes LAN Systems, Inc - European Support Office
Lines: 11

My Company is thinking about trying to support something such as SLIP
on our terminal server ports.  With PPP now becoming defined and SLIP
still kinda implementation specific, what does the net think about the
advisability of moving to PPP.  Of course, the no-brainer answer would
be to do both but that costs time and money :-).  Seriously, if people
have thoughts on this subject, I'd like to hear about it either via
email or posting.  I'll summarize the email traffic if I receive any.
Thanks
-- 
Jim Sanchez  {sun,hplabs}!sytek!syteke!jim OR
Hughes LAN Systems, Brussels  uunet!prlb2!sunbim!syteke!jim