Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!iuvax!watmath!bstempleton From: bstempleton@watmath.waterloo.edu (Brad Templeton) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: Paying for Shareware (Was: Re: v09i070: newsclip 1.1...) Message-ID: <34812@watmath.waterloo.edu> Date: 4 Mar 90 19:23:18 GMT References: <14010@s.ms.uky.edu> <125816@midas.UUCP> <635@magnus.Hotline.Com> <34720@watmath.waterloo.edu> <639@magnus.Hotline.Com> Reply-To: bstempleton@watmath.waterloo.edu (Brad Templeton) Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 27 If I said "USENET is a commercial" network I went a bit beyond what I meant. What I thought I said was that USENET is not non-commercial, in that commercial traffic is not barred -- or even discouraged in many cases -- on this network. I don't have to provide documentation on a claim as to what USENET is not. What has to be shown is that USENET is any particular thing. The burden of proof is on somebody who makes an assertion about what is, not on somebody who denies it. You can quote from news.announce.newusers all you like. I wrote some of that stuff directly, and helped in the writing of other parts of it. Quote my own stuff if you like. It doesn't define what USENET is. Those files are simply volunteer works that a few people liked and turned into regular postings. That's all. I know, I was there. They aren't official in any way, they were never "approved." Dozens of commercial activities take place on USENET. Job postings, Ads, announcements, tech support, people asking for help in their work, cars for sale, rooms for rent, software updates and yes, shareware and lots of it (with effectively no complaint prior to this debate.) The burden of proof lies with those who would argue that USENET follows their particular ideology. It's a tough burden, because USENET has no ideology that I have seen in my 9 years on it -- other than that derived from the laws of the nations it is in. -- Brad Templeton, Looking Glass Software, Waterloo, Ont. (519) 884-7473