Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!shelby!agate!pasteur!cory.Berkeley.EDU!navas
From: navas@cory.Berkeley.EDU (David C. Navas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Recommendations needed about A2500/30 as research workstation
Message-ID: <22494@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 28 Feb 90 19:59:39 GMT
References: <6623@cps3xx.UUCP> <2017@sauron.Columbia.NCR.COM>
Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: navas@cory.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (David C. Navas)
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 11

In article <2017@sauron.Columbia.NCR.COM> stevem@sauron.UUCP (Steve McClure) writes:
>I can't give you any concrete numbers here, however the '030 and 386 should
>be comperable.

The '030' is, of course, a faster chip than an equivalently clocked '386.
The '486' is, of course, faster yet.

>Steve.McClure@Columbia.NCR.COM

David Navas                                   navas@cory.berkeley.edu
"Think you can, think you can't -- either way it's true."  Henry Ford