Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!van-bc! From: lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca (Larry Phillips) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: IBM vs AMIGA cost Message-ID: <1181@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca> Date: 28 Feb 90 21:46:06 GMT Lines: 19 Return-Path: To: van-bc!rnews In <5527@ur-cc.UUCP>, jea@merlin.cvs.rochester.edu (Joanne Albano) writes: >Several folk here claim that an equivalently loaded IBM-clone >system with 40 meg HD, 3 Megs ram, '386 and VGA graphics with >monitor costs $600-800 less than than the A2500/30 at $3600 >(ed discount price). Is this true? Might be... how much is the multitasking ability, NTSC video output, and HAM mode? -larry -- Gallium Arsenide is the technology of the future; always has been, always will be. +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | // Larry Phillips | | \X/ lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca -or- uunet!van-bc!lpami!lphillips | | COMPUSERVE: 76703,4322 -or- 76703.4322@compuserve.com | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+