Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!columbia!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!es1 From: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Floyd-Steinberg dither (and A2630 related questions/requests) Keywords: Looking for a 1bit FS converter Message-ID: <1990Mar5.165914.6871@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Date: 5 Mar 90 16:59:14 GMT References: <8100@sdcc6.ucsd.edu> <32384@auc.UUCP> <9987@cbmvax.commodore.com> Sender: usenet@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Network News) Reply-To: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) Organization: Columbia University Lines: 35 FOR DAVE HAYNIE: In article <9987@cbmvax.commodore.com> daveh@cbmvax (Dave Haynie) writes: >In article <32384@auc.UUCP> rar@auc.UUCP (Rodney Ricks) writes: > >>Ok. HEY COMMODORE!!! HOW ABOUT A "A2640", 50MHz, 68040 board, that can hold >>up to 8Mb of RAM, (that you can get with 0K installed), and with a >>daughterboard expansion bus, that you can put, say, 3 boards on, for up to >>256Mb of RAM!!! > >First of all, you'll probably have a long wait for 50MHz 68040s. And if you >wanted an A2000 Coprocessor card with an '040 on it, it could be done. But >the amount of room extra on the thing, like for memory and all, would be >less than what you get today on an A2630. And that only have room for 4 megs. >At least based on the same level of board technology. And the daughterboard >connector isn't a general purpose expansion bus, it's designed for a single >>Rodney Ricks, Morehouse College \/ > > >-- >Dave Haynie Commodore-Amiga (Systems Engineering) "The Crew That Never Rests" > {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!daveh PLINK: hazy BIX: hazy > Too much of everything is just enough Dave, I was wondering if you could explain why Commodore had a big logo in the Motorola list of 68040 developers if Commodore isn't working on a 68040 Amiga? I'm sure Commodore had to pay to be a developer! -- Ethan Ethan Solomita: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu Compu$erve : 70137,3271 Anyone giving away Amigas or Sharp Scanners???