Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!hercule!stefan
From: stefan@hercule.cs.concordia.ca (BUCHHOLZ stefan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: AudioVisual Presentation
Keywords: CanDo, DeluxeVideo, Video Titlers
Message-ID: <1899@clyde.concordia.ca>
Date: 7 Mar 90 04:45:29 GMT
References: <25357@swrinde.nde.swri.edu>
Sender: usenet@clyde.concordia.ca
Reply-To: stefan@hercule.CS.Concordia.CA (BUCHHOLZ stefan)
Distribution: na
Organization: Concordia University, Montreal Quebec
Lines: 35




In response to the Cando VS DVIII comparison request...


 Here at the multimedia lab, we use both Cando and DVIII quite extensively.


Let me first say that they both excellent peices of software, I am especially
impressed with Cando. It is 96% rock solid at version 1.0 which is a first
for any Amiga software product.

	Cando is an authoring system: You use it to write applications,
interactive tutorials and the like. If you have 3 megs, you won't have any 
probelm with either packages. 

	DVIII provides built in wipes, more time-control, midi support, anim &
animbrush support, NO scripting (!!), but can be interactive...

	Cando provides primitives for editors, document viewing, intuition
gadgets for your windows etc..

I guess what I am trying to say is that Cando is more for an interactive
program wheareas DVII excells at timing and presentation...

I think for your purposes, get DVIII although I think Cando is another
necessity in anyones software collection.  Warning!!! mem > 1 meg!!

							LePew 

*******************************************************************************
Stefan Buchholz * Concordia University Computer Science * a.k.a Stefy LePew
stefan@doyle.cs.concordia.ca  > MITE AVsita Multimedia lab system support <<
******************************************************************************