Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!leah!bingvaxu!bingsune.cc.binghamton.edu!consp24
From: consp24@bingsune.cc.binghamton.edu (consp24)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm
Subject: Re: Disgruntled Word Writer 4 purchaser
Message-ID: <3077@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu>
Date: 1 Mar 90 19:40:20 GMT
References: <1990Mar1.012233.25946@xenitec.on.ca> <8786@shlump.nac.dec.com>
Sender: usenet@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu
Reply-To: consp24@bingsune.cc.binghamton.edu (consp24)
Distribution: na
Organization: SUNY Binghamton
Lines: 22


>   OK, I'm showing personal bias here, but I suggest PaperClip. It
>offers all but #4 of the above, and I've found it to be about the
>best post-formatting word processor I've used. If you have a C64 (as
>opposed to a C128), then you might consider spending the time to
>look for an older version, as PaperClip III was ported from the C128
>to the C64 and is rather cramped. The original PaperClip 64 had
>about 30K text space, I think.

     Put my vote in for PaperClip as well.  Last I heard, PaperClip III
for the 64 had about 5 pages worth of text memory, but included such
features as spell check, telecommunications, and printer driver 
editing (I rewrote the print driver for the Seikosha SP1000VC so
it would do italics/underline; this took all of five minutes.)

      I would suggest PaperClip wholeheartedly.

Gregg W. Riedel     CONSP24 @ BINGVAXA, BINGVAXU, BINGSUNS
Student Consultant - State Univ. of New York at Binghamton
----------------------------------------------------------
"There are few personal problems that can't be solved by a
        suitable application of high explosives."