Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:45626 comp.dcom.lans:4489
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!decwrl!amdcad!pepsi.amd.com!phil
From: phil@pepsi.amd.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.dcom.lans
Subject: Sun PC/NFS sockdrv.sys vs qemm
Message-ID: <29356@amdcad.AMD.COM>
Date: 3 Mar 90 02:36:47 GMT
Sender: news@amdcad.AMD.COM
Reply-To: phil@pepsi.amd.com ()
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Sunnyvale CA
Lines: 9

I just saw an article where someone said they used Qualitas' 386^max to
load sockdrv.sys in the 384K area. I'm using Quarterdeck's QEMM 5.0 and
loadhi complains about something that sockdrv's doing. Is there
something different/better that Qualitas does or is QEMM's msg something
that can cheerfully be ignored?

--
Phil Ngai, phil@amd.com		{uunet,decwrl,ucbvax}!amdcad!phil
A PC without DESQview is like Unix without ^Z.