Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucsd!ucsdhub!dcdwest!plb From: plb@dcdwest.UUCP (Phil Blais) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer Subject: Re: Turbo C vs Turbo C Pro Summary: MSC vs Turbo Message-ID: <579@dcdwest.UUCP> Date: 1 Mar 90 17:02:05 GMT References: <2617@wyse.wyse.com> Sender: news@dcdwest.UUCP Distribution: usa Organization: ITT Defense Communications, San Diego Lines: 9 In article , zen@pawl.rpi.edu writes: > > Turbo C Pro has two programs bundled with it besides Turbo C. > The programs are Turbo Assembler, and Turbo Debugger. I hope I'm not opening a can of worms here but I've just gotta ask. For those who have used both - how does Turbo C Pro compare with Microsoft C with MASM, Codeview i.e. if given a choice and cost was not an issue why would you chose one over the other? While were at it might as well include Lattice also. (If all this has been previously discussed and posted could someone please summarize by e-mail.) phil blais