Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!think!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!news From: ehrlich@cs.psu.edu (Daniel Ehrlich) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt Subject: Re: hc2.1y and dbx Message-ID: Date: 1 Mar 90 18:35:49 GMT References: <1990Feb27.225719.1443@terminator.cc.umich.edu> Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet) Organization: Computer Science Department, Penn State University Lines: 19 In-Reply-To: ric@rioja.ifs.umich.edu's message of 27 Feb 90 22:57:19 GMT In article <1990Feb27.225719.1443@terminator.cc.umich.edu> ric@rioja.ifs.umich.edu (Richard Campbell) writes: Richard> At the Washington Usenix RT/AOS4.3 bof, it Richard> was mentioned that hc2.1y was in very good shape Richard> and that it worked well with dbx. Richard> Now that we have hc2.1y, we're not exactly seeing Richard> wonderfullness on the dbx front. Should we? Or do we Richard> need to pick up a new dbx? Which DBX are you using? The dbx that came with the Sep/Dec 88 release or the one issued by Eric Brunner as patch V1.15 parts 1 through 5? The dbx that came originaly was never very useful. The new version is archived on the host bikini.cis.ufl.edu [128.227.224.1] in the directory pub/ibm-rt-fixes. -- Dan Ehrlich Voice: +1 814 863 1142 FAX: +1 814 865 3176