Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!uw-beaver!mit-eddie!mintaka!think!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!stjhmc!f14.n114.z1.fidonet.org!Leo.Bores
From: Leo.Bores@f14.n114.z1.fidonet.org (Leo Bores)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Bibliographic database?
Message-ID: <14017.25F32DA5@stjhmc.fidonet.org>
Date: 6 Mar 90 02:29:47 GMT
Sender: ufgate@stjhmc.fidonet.org (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:114/14 - Eye Net, Scottsdale AZ
Lines: 23

In an article of <2 Mar 90 18:05:32 GMT>, dpaight@weber.ucsd.edu (Dan Paight) 
writes:

 DP>Hmm. How large is "large." When you're talking abstracts? I recall
 DP>reading in the EndNote manual that any field can hold as much as
 DP>32k. Getting the text into EN is just a matter of cutting and
 DP>pasting. So what could be easier? (That's not a rhetorical question.
 DP>If BE has an easier way, I'd like to know about it.)
 DP>

Ah so! It's 32K in BE via direct import or cut-n-paste. Missed that in BE. I 
use both for various advantages - so far I use BE the most and have a stack 
containing 4000 references.

Leo Bores, M.D.

 



--  
Uucp: ...{gatech,ames,rutgers}!ncar!asuvax!stjhmc!14!Leo.Bores
Internet: Leo.Bores@f14.n114.z1.fidonet.org