Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!decwrl!shelby!neon!Kermit.Stanford.EDU!philip
From: philip@Kermit.Stanford.EDU (Philip Machanick)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hypercard
Subject: Re: HyperCard V2 compared to V1.*
Message-ID: <1990Mar6.070118.3619@Neon.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 6 Mar 90 07:01:18 GMT
References: <8931@shlump.nac.dec.com>
Sender: root@Neon.Stanford.EDU (System PRIVILEGED Account)
Reply-To: philip@pescadero.stanford.edu
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University
Lines: 10

In article <8931@shlump.nac.dec.com>, mason@habs11.enet.dec.com (Gary
Mason) writes:
> Can anyone who may have seen HyperCard V2 in any depth remark on whether my
> stack of V1.* books will become instantly obsolete?  Is there a chance that
> there will only be a need to acquire "upgrade" books for V2?  Any inklings
> about pricing of the upgrade while we're at it?
I hope the upgrade costs the same as the original...

Philip Machanick
philip@pescadero.stanford.edu