Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!sunic!kth.se!draken!d88-jwa
From: d88-jwa@nada.kth.se (Jon Watte)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: List Manager Strangeness
Message-ID: <3050@draken.nada.kth.se>
Date: 1 Mar 90 23:10:13 GMT
References: <20392@bellcore.bellcore.com> <10841@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> <3039@draken.nada.kth.se> <14318@reed.UUCP>
Reply-To: d88-jwa@nada.kth.se (Jon W{tte)
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Lines: 23

In article <14318@reed.UUCP> bowman@reed.UUCP (Eric Bowman) writes:
>In article <3039@draken.nada.kth.se> d88-jwa@nada.kth.se (Jon W{tte) writes:

>>thing (in fact, you cannot take the address of an array in C...)

>I don't think fact is the right word to use here...since this statement
>has nothing to do with truth.

>	char a[5],b[5],c[5],*d[3];

>The beauty of C is no matter what weird and potentially pointless thing
>you want to do, you can do it.

I know. I could have sworn I happened upon some strange construct
using "address of array" or some such that wasn't valid C a while
ago...

Maybe it was something like char *(foo[]); which is _not_ valid C.

h+
-- 
   ---  Stay alert !  -  Trust no one !  -  Keep your laser handy !  ---
             h+@nada.kth.se  ==  h+@proxxi.se  ==  Jon Watte
                    longer .sig available on request