Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!crdgw1!ge-dab!tarpit!bilver!bill
From: bill@bilver.UUCP (Bill Vermillion)
Newsgroups: comp.terminals
Subject: Re: Link MC-10 terminals
Message-ID: <508@bilver.UUCP>
Date: 1 Mar 90 00:00:44 GMT
References: <1990Feb26.231711.9073@edm.uucp->
Reply-To: bill@bilver.UUCP (Bill Vermillion)
Organization: W. J. Vermillion, Winter Park, FL
Lines: 22

In article <1990Feb26.231711.9073@edm.uucp-> geoff@edm.uucp (Geoff Coleman) writes:
->Help                            
->	We have installed at our site a number of LINK MC-10 terminals
->which we are trying to run at 38400. This seems to be a pointless 
->exercise as no matter what type of flow control we try we get garbaged 
->screens when we try to send lots of data to the screen. Has anyone out there
->had success or lack there of with these terminals? The support person I've
->been talking to at LINK says that he has heard no complaints but I know
->that I've seen at least one negative comment in this news group in 
->recent weeks.

Well I talked with Link last week, and have new ROMS for the MC-5's and they
said there will be a new rom for the MC-10 in a few weeks, and they will ship
that to me when it is available.   If there were no problems, (ha!), why the
new ROMS?

(I beleive I was the complainant).

Will keep the net posted on what I find.   
-- 
Bill Vermillion - UUCP: uunet!tarpit!bilver!bill
                      : bill@bilver.UUCP