Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!mintaka!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!sumax!thebes!polari!corwin From: corwin@polari.UUCP (Don Glover) Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix Subject: Re: SCO stopping enhancements for Xenix? Keywords: SCO Xenix Message-ID: <1316@polari.UUCP> Date: 1 Mar 90 15:46:57 GMT References: <1313@polari.UUCP> <213@van-bc.UUCP> Organization: Seattle Online Public Unix (206) 328-4944 Lines: 20 In article <213@van-bc.UUCP>, jtc@van-bc.UUCP (J.T. Conklin) writes: > In article <1313@polari.UUCP> corwin@polari.UUCP (Don Glover) writes: > >No, BUT what has just happened indicates that this might be the case. In > >[much deleted] > > I hope this is not true -- First no NFS and then no DS upgrade > for XENIX. This ties my hands as a developer, and I can't afford > to orphan XENIX just like that. > > [why he would like the compiler deleted] As an additional note, latter that same day I talked to tech support where I got my original info on the upgrade, They gave the same story that ther would be no xenix compiler upgrades forth comming. BUT, I received a call back from yet another sales type (I was having trouble getting sco to return my calls, so I put calls in to a bunch of peoplee) who tells me that in a memo dated 2/23/89 it states that there is a an update going to be available in 'late march'. What this all means I don't know, but I suspect that noone is in charge down at sco.