Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!texbell!texsun!newstop!grapevine!bitbug From: bitbug@lonewolf.sun.com (James Buster) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: The purpose of info-gcc. Message-ID: Date: 1 Mar 90 08:21:13 GMT References: <9002272346.AA01632@sugar-bombs.ai.mit.edu> <708@qmfl.jrdc.go.jp> <35328@grapevine.EBay.Sun.COM> <2201@milton.acs.washington.edu> Sender: news@grapevine.EBay.Sun.COM Distribution: gnu Organization: Sun Microsystems Federal, Inc. Lines: 15 In-reply-to: skyhawk@milton.acs.washington.edu's message of 1 Mar 90 06:12:42 GMT In article <2201@milton.acs.washington.edu> skyhawk@milton.acs.washington.edu (Scott Northrop) writes: >In article <35328@grapevine.EBay.Sun.COM> bitbug@lonewolf.sun.com (James Buster) writes: >>How about the creation of a new newsgroup, gnu.design.discuss? > >I fail to see why gnu.misc.discuss is not adequate for design >discussions. It's there, why not use it? Because gnu.misc.discuss seems primarily for political discussions. I want a newsgroup exclusively for software design issues. Politics has its place, and it isn't there. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- James Buster (Domain) bitbug@lonewolf.ebay.sun.com Mad Hacker Extraordinaire (UUCP) ...!sun.com!lonewolf!bitbug ---------------------------------------------------------------------