Path: utzoo!utgpu!CUNYVM!IBMTCP-L
Date:	Wed, 28 Feb 90 15:31:00 EST
Reply-To: IBM TCP/IP For VM List <IBMTCP-L@CUNYVM.bitnet>
Sender: IBM TCP/IP For VM List <IBMTCP-L@CUNYVM.bitnet>
From:	"Philip G. Pishioneri 814 865 0824" <PGP@PSUVM.bitnet>
Subject:      Re: Hyperchannel under VM/XA
To:	UofToronto LAN redistribution <IBMTCP-L@UTORGPU.uucp>
References:  IBMTCP-L AT CUNYVM -- Tue, 27 Feb 90 17:34:28 EST
Message-ID: <90Feb28.153435est.57358@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca>
Newsgroups: list.ibmtcp-l
Distribution: ut
Approved: devnull@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu

Our HCPRIO:
              RDEVICE DEVTYPE=A220,DEVNO=(E00,64),CLASS=DASD

(A220 is of course "unknown")

and our IOCP for same:

         CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=E00,PATH=(5E),SHARED=N,UNIT=A220,            X
               UNITADD=((00,64))
         IODEVICE ADDRESS=(E00,64),CUNUMBR=E00,UNIT=A220

We went with the DASD class because the original DMKRIO example used a 3830
CUTYPE (which is a disk control unit).  Later recommendations may now be
different; anyone have the definitive word?  I already saw that UCBCMSA uses
class=DISPLAY.

-Phil