Xref: utzoo rec.radio.shortwave:1394 news.groups:18301 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!bu.edu!buengc!bph From: bph@buengc.BU.EDU (Blair P. Houghton) Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave,news.groups Subject: DISCUSSION of rec.radio.broadcast (Re: VOTE on rec.radio.noncomm) Message-ID: <5437@buengc.BU.EDU> Date: 2 Mar 90 15:19:37 GMT References: <177@ka2qhd.UUCP| <32018@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <283@mikebat.UUCP> <507@ssc.UUCP> <10498@hoptoad.uucp> <1699@speedy.mcnc.org> Reply-To: bph@buengc.bu.edu (Blair P. Houghton) Followup-To: rec.radio.shortwave Distribution: na Organization: Boston Univ. Col. of Eng. Lines: 35 In article <1699@speedy.mcnc.org> spl@duck.ncsc.org (Steve Lamont) writes: >In article <10498@hoptoad.uucp> pozar@hoptoad.UUCP (Tim Pozar) writes: >> Uh, noncommercial stations are not restricted to 88-92MHz. >>You'll find plenty of them between 92-108Mhz and the AM Standard >>Broadcast band (aka Medium Wave). "Noncommercial"? Hmm. Silly mee. I saw "rec.radio.noncomm" and thought it meant "noncommunications" as in telemetry and Loran and that sort of thing... ...and I got real apathetic... Well, that's changing right now. I don't see where there's any sort of a need to delineate between for-profit and non-profit radio. And if there was, I'd certainly expect the new group to concentrate on commercial radio rather than noncommercial. It would make more sense if there was a rec.radio.broadcast for discussions of mainstream, non-hobbyist radio bands. (Including not only the N.A. 535-1600KHz and 88-108MHz, but also the Far-Eastern 76-92MHz and Eurasian/African LW bands). Any takers for a change in the paradigm? > spl (the p stands for > public broadcasting is > in my blood...) Okay, buddy. Put your arms out, close your eyes, tilt your head back, hold this piece of coax in your mouth, and touch your nose -- HOLD IT! Perfect. Now stand like that for 24 minutes... --Blair "Stop scratching! You're making snow all over the Tardis..."