Xref: utzoo news.groups:18304 alt.config:1522
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!jarthur!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!mahendo!jplgodo!wlbr!hacgate!ashtate!dbase!dveditz
From: dveditz@dbase.A-T.COM (Dan Veditz)
Newsgroups: news.groups,alt.config
Subject: Re: Various topics
Message-ID: <449@dbase.A-T.COM>
Date: 2 Mar 90 01:40:07 GMT
References: <31@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Organization: Ashton Tate Development Center Glendale, Calif.
Lines: 15

rissa@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Patricia O Tuama) writes:
> Oh, I'm sorry, I thought you read news.groups on a regular basis.
> Those of us who do know I was referring to soc.religion.eastern 
> which started off as a talk group and was switched to a soc group 
> in order to get better distribution.

Actually, the relevant fact was that it was MODERATED, so it
belonged with the other moderated soc.religion groups and not
with the unmoderated talk.religion groups.

What's the point of a free-speech hierarchy if there's a potential
censor in charge of each group?

-Dan Veditz                            dveditz@dbase.A-T.com       
Vote NO on moderated talk.* groups     { uunet | ncar!cepu }!ashtate!dveditz