Xref: utzoo rec.radio.shortwave:1408 news.groups:18343
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!snorkelwacker!bu.edu!buengc!bph
From: bph@buengc.BU.EDU (Blair P. Houghton)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave,news.groups
Subject: Re: DISCUSSION of rec.radio.broadcast (Re: VOTE on rec.radio.noncomm)
Message-ID: <5442@buengc.BU.EDU>
Date: 4 Mar 90 00:35:34 GMT
References: <177@ka2qhd.UUCP| <32018@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <283@mikebat.UUCP> <507@ssc.UUCP> <10498@hoptoad.uucp> <1699@speedy.mcnc.org> <5437@buengc.BU.EDU> <7029@internal.Apple.COM>
Reply-To: bph@buengc.bu.edu (Blair P. Houghton)
Followup-To: rec.radio.shortwave
Distribution: na
Organization: Boston Univ. Col. of Eng.
Lines: 24

In article <7029@internal.Apple.COM> ems@Apple.COM (Mike Smith) writes:
>In article <5437@buengc.BU.EDU> bph@buengc.bu.edu (Blair P. Houghton) writes:
>>In article <1699@speedy.mcnc.org> spl@duck.ncsc.org (Steve Lamont) writes:
>>>In article <10498@hoptoad.uucp> pozar@hoptoad.UUCP (Tim Pozar) writes:
>>>>    Uh, noncommercial stations are not restricted to 88-92MHz.
>
>>"Noncommercial"?  Hmm.  Silly mee.  I saw "rec.radio.noncomm"
>>and thought it meant "noncommunications" as in telemetry and
>>Loran and that sort of thing...
>
>Gee ... And I thought it meant 'non commissioned' like, say, pirates ...:-)

I'm _so_ glad that someone's already gone and called for votes
on this one.

Would someone please send me the address to which to send my NO vote?

Remember, if you don't vote no, people who don't have any more
of a clue as to the deficiencies of the proposed group will vote
yes, and then we'll be stuck with it.

				--Blair
				  "Gad I hate politics almost
				   as much as I hate lunatics."