Path: utzoo!mnetor!geac!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!neat.cs.toronto.edu!gara
From: gara@theory.toronto.edu (Gara Pruesse)
Newsgroups: ont.singles
Subject: Re: call to vote. (was Re: BIMS, TROLLIPS, BABES : Women of Our Time)
Summary: Emphatic no
Keywords: no, no, and no
Message-ID: <90Feb28.123022est.6212@neat.cs.toronto.edu>
Date: 28 Feb 90 17:30:48 GMT
References: <5093.25e9b314@uwovax.uwo.ca> <1990Feb27.002117.18215@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> <KIM.90Feb27010335@watnow.waterloo.edu> <HAROLDT.90Feb28115851@yunexus.yorku.ca>
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Lines: 4

On the question of whether "chick" is a term of endearment,
I cast an emphatic "NO" vote. 

-gara