Newsgroups: ont.singles
Path: utzoo!utgpu!gwowen
From: gwowen@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca (George Owen)
Subject: Re: call to vote. (was Re: BIMS, TROLLIPS, BABES : Women of Our Time)
Message-ID: <1990Feb28.191944.867@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca>
Keywords: no, no, and no
Organization: UTCS Public Access
References: <5093.25e9b314@uwovax.uwo.ca> <1990Feb27.002117.18215@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> <KIM.90Feb27010335@watnow.waterloo.edu> <HAROLDT.90Feb28115851@yunexus.yorku.ca> <90Feb28.123022est.6212@neat.cs.toronto.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 90 19:19:44 GMT

In article <90Feb28.123022est.6212@neat.cs.toronto.edu> gara@theory.toronto.edu (Gara Pruesse) writes:
>On the question of whether "chick" is a term of endearment,
>I cast an emphatic "NO" vote. 
>

     THAT'S IT , GIVE 'EM HELL !!!!!


   - G -