Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!ukma!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!mit-eddie!BBN.COM!eboneste@BBN.COM
From: eboneste@BBN.COM (Liz Bonesteel)
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: Rolling Stone reviews, Sinead, and Kate
Message-ID: <52833@bbn.COM>
Date: 1 Mar 90 16:23:04 GMT
References: <9002282240.AA26871@EDDIE.MIT.EDU>
Sender: news@BBN.COM
Reply-To: Liz Bonesteel <eboneste@BBN.COM>
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
Lines: 13
Approved: nessus@eddie.mit.edu


In article <9002282240.AA26871@EDDIE.MIT.EDU> MTARR@EAGLE.WESLEYAN.EDU writes:
>
>Speaking of Rolling Stone reviews, why the HELL didn't they review TSW?!?  

Speaking more of Rolling Stone, I heard a rumor they trashed HOL when
it came out.  Can anyone confirm this?

Liz (who is looking forward to Sinead's new album in spite of the fact
    that RS liked it)
----
Just watch them swing with the wind
    out to sea...