Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!mit-eddie!ecs.soton.ac.UK!root@ecs.soton.ac.UK
From: root@ecs.soton.ac.UK (Operator)
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Submission for rec-music-gaffa
Message-ID: <1570.9003020744@hilliard.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: 2 Mar 90 07:44:29 GMT
Sender: daemon@eddie.mit.edu (Mr Background)
Organization: Love-Hounds Anonymous
Lines: 21
Approved: nessus@eddie.mit.edu

Path: sot-ecs!icdoc!ukc!harrier.ukc.ac.uk!zodiac.ukc.ac.uk!lll-winken!das!ed
From: ed@das.llnl.gov (Edward Suranyi)
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: Rolling Stone reviews, Sinead, and Kate
Message-ID: <50549@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV>
Date: 1 Mar 90 20:42:18 GMT
References: <9002282240.AA26871@EDDIE.MIT.EDU> <52833@bbn.COM>
Sender: usenet@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV
Reply-To: ed@das.UUCP (Edward Suranyi)
Organization: Dept. of Applied Science, UC Davis at LLNL
Lines: 7

Linz Boneseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeelllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll<eboneste@BBN.COM> write?s:
>
Speaking more of Rolling Stone, I heard a rumor they tr?ashed OOOOOOOO            hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
>it came out  Can anyone confirm this?

When? _HoL_ cameout, _Rolling Stone_ wasn't giviggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggstars in its 
r?eviews.  (They aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa                                    tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttpppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee                
                    oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo                                                  oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeereason a few months earlier?,
addddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddthey just started again about a eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeer