Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!aero!regard@hpsdde.hp.com
From: regard@hpsdde.hp.com (Adrienne Regard)
Newsgroups: soc.feminism
Subject: Re: Single Sex Colleges
Message-ID: <3381@hp-sdd.hp.com>
Date: 2 Mar 90 20:11:05 GMT
References: <2412@randvax.UUCP> <9540@portia.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: nadel@aerospace.aero.org
Reply-To: twinsun!ucsd.edu!regard%hpsdde.UUCP (Adrienne Regard)
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, San Diego Division
Lines: 14
Approved: nadel@aerospace.aero.org
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 463
Status: R



Well, the real point is this.

I'd be awfully surprised to see people who disagreed with single-sex
institutions IF IT WERE POSSIBLE to insure harmful discrimination did
not result from them.

There isn't anything any more wrong with all-male than all-female,
except that all-male has also meant powerbase and all-female has meant
powerless.    

When we get to the place where these equations no longer apply, we
will all be happier people.

Adrienne Regard