Xref: utzoo sci.electronics:10550 comp.graphics:10347 comp.std.internat:604 rec.video:11056 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!cit-vax!wen-king From: wen-king@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu (King Su) Newsgroups: sci.electronics,comp.graphics,comp.std.internat,rec.video Subject: Re: U.S. HDTV STANDARDS DELEGATION SCUTTLES 1920x1080 COMMON IMAGE FOR Message-ID: <14248@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> Date: 13 Mar 90 07:18:56 GMT References: <8Zx8Ip200ioEMMrHEF@andrew.cmu.edu> <132618@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <2694@sactoh0.UUCP> <1990Mar13.023805.24765@athena.mit.edu> Reply-To: wen-king@cit-vax.UUCP (Wen-King Su) Organization: California Institute of Technology Lines: 33 In article <1990Mar13.023805.24765@athena.mit.edu> pshen@atrp.mit.edu (Paul Shen) writes: >In article <2694@sactoh0.UUCP> mfolivo@sactoh0.UUCP (Mark F. Newton) writes: >>.... <>OUr companies should save the money, and come up with better and >>less expensive HDTV sets, rather than spend money onsomething <>completely different, thus making early HDTV sets incredibly >>expensive, as the US companies try to recoup development costs, <>thus making the sets very unpopular. >>.... possible, only if we knows about the detail of the technology. It is the only market can keep our semiconductor industry running is the