Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mailrus!cornell!deb
From: deb@svax.cs.cornell.edu (David Baraff)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: virtual static class functions
Summary: Why not?
Message-ID: <38579@cornell.UUCP>
Date: 13 Mar 90 16:04:34 GMT
Sender: nobody@cornell.UUCP
Reply-To: deb@svax.cs.cornell.edu (David Baraff)
Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept, Ithaca NY
Lines: 7

Why can't static class functions be virtual? That is,
is there some reason why allowing static virtual class functions
would be bad? I can't see that the implementation would pose
any problems.

	David Baraff
	deb@svax.cs.cornell.edu