Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:26792 comp.lang.misc:4404
Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!motcsd!mcdcup!mcdchg!att!cbnewsc!lgm
From: lgm@cbnewsc.ATT.COM (lawrence.g.mayka)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: problems/risks ...
Message-ID: <14312@cbnewsc.ATT.COM>
Date: 11 Mar 90 14:37:28 GMT
References: <6421@eos.UUCP>
Reply-To: lgm@cbnewsc.ATT.COM (lawrence.g.mayka,ihp,)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 19

In article <6421@eos.UUCP> woody@eos.UUCP (Wayne Wood) writes:
>i agree.  if we followed everyboy's advice on what was dangerous in a 
>programming language, we would all be programming in LISP.

Well, I'm glad someone finally admitted it!  Let me know if you
need a list of commercial Common Lisp implementations. :-)

>read Abelson and Sussman for an example of someone who "protects"
>programmers.

Try a Symbolics workstation for an example of a development
environment that works *with* programmers instead of against them.


	Lawrence G. Mayka
	AT&T Bell Laboratories
	lgm@ihlpf.att.com

Standard disclaimer.