Xref: utzoo comp.software-eng:3151 comp.lang.ada:3422 comp.lang.c:26808 comp.lang.lisp:2903 comp.lang.misc:4412 comp.lang.modula2:2165 comp.lang.pascal:3213
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!texbell!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.modula2,comp.lang.pascal
Subject: Re: problems/risks due to programming language, stories requested
Message-ID: <L662C+3ggpc2@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 12 Mar 90 04:06:28 GMT
References: <1004@micropen> <8218@hubcap.clemson.edu> <2596@gmu90x.gmu.edu> <672@software.software.org> <775@s5.Morgan.COM>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Followup-To: comp.software-eng,comp.lang.misc
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 7

> This stuff doesn't belong in comp.lang.pascal. It goes in comp.lang.c,
> right(?).

No, it doesn't belong in comp.lang.c either. Language lawyers should hold
their court in comp.lang.misc or alt.religion.computers. this thread may have
some slight relevence to comp.software-eng. It doesn't belong in any of
comp.lang.{c,ada}... and even less in comp.lang.{lisp,modula2,pascal}.
-- 
 _--_|\  `-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. <peter@ficc.uu.net>.
/      \  'U`
\_.--._/
      v