Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!forsight!jato!mars!kaleb
From: kaleb@mars.jpl.nasa.gov (Kaleb Keithley)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2
Subject: Re: OS/2 2.0 on a 386SX? Will there be any problems?
Message-ID: <3049@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov>
Date: 9 Mar 90 18:26:50 GMT
References: <404@digi.UUCP>
Sender: news@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov
Reply-To: kaleb@mars.UUCP (Kaleb Keithley)
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.
Lines: 13

In article <404@digi.UUCP> cfoughty@digi.UUCP (Cy Foughty) writes:
>
>Well, MICROSOFT. Will it JUST THE SAME?

Why should there be any problems, the 386SX is 100% compatible with the DX.

Norton's SI 4.0 EE can't tell the difference between an SX and a DX, so
why sould OS/2 2.0 care.  It'll just be slower.

kaleb@mars.jpl.nasa.gov            Jet Propeller Labs
Kaleb Keithley

spelling and grammar flames > /dev/null