Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!dptg!mtuni!psu
From: psu@mtuni.ATT.COM (Paul Siu)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: IBM vs AMIGA cost
Summary: Making IBM to an Amiga proves nothing
Keywords: IBM, Amiga
Message-ID: <2851@mtuni.ATT.COM>
Date: 5 Mar 90 22:10:21 GMT
References: <5527@ur-cc.UUCP> <8ZvN8Vy00UgyI1flpP@andrew.cmu.edu> <132465@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Reply-To: psu@mtuni.ATT.COM (Paul Siu)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Middletown, NJ, USA
Lines: 5

I notice a lot of post on extra costs that you have to add to an IBM machine.
You can't compare an IBM to an Amiga by adding accessories to an IBM so it looks
like an Amiga!  It only proves that IBM makes a poor Amiga.  Each machine has
its own strength and weakness.  Comparing computers in such matters proves
nothing.