Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!apple!uokmax!occrsh!occrsh.ATT.COM!mwood.UUCP!attcc.UUCP!bn
From: bn@attcc.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: IBM vs AMIGA cost
Message-ID: <19000041@attcc.UUCP>
Date: 5 Mar 90 02:37:00 GMT
References: <5527@ur-cc.UUCP>
Lines: 15
Nf-ID: #R:ur-cc.UUCP:-552700:attcc.UUCP:19000041:000:712
Nf-From: attcc.UUCP!bn    Mar  4 20:37:00 1990


In article <5527@ur-cc.UUCP> jea@cvs.rochester.edu (Joanne Albano) writes:
>Several folk here claim that an equivalently loaded IBM-clone
>system with 40 meg HD, 3 Megs ram, '386 and VGA graphics with
>monitor costs $600-800 less than than the A2500/30 at $3600
> Room 274 Meliora Hall, Univ. of Rochester, Rochester NY 14627 
> INTERNET: jea@cvs.rochester.edu

Don't forget, that with the Ed. Disc. Amiga 2500/30 package you also get the AT bridgeboard. Do you get an extra Amiga when you buy a '386 clone?   8-) 
In addition, if you add AMAX to the system, you can run just about anything.
(Well, maybe not the Atari ST software  8-)

Bo Najdrovsky
UUCP:  att!mwood!attcc!bn
INET:  mwood!attcc!bn@ATT.ATT.COM