Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!texbell!texsun!newstop!sun!stpeter!cmcmanis
From: cmcmanis@stpeter.Sun.COM (Chuck McManis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: AW tidbits 4/90 -> WB 2.0 not 1.4
Message-ID: <132707@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: 8 Mar 90 20:33:43 GMT
References: <2826@uwm.edu>
Sender: news@sun.Eng.Sun.COM
Reply-To: cmcmanis@sun.UUCP (Chuck McManis)
Distribution: na
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mountain View
Lines: 14

In article <2826@uwm.edu> duncan@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Shan D Duncan) writes:
>What's this I read in April issue of AmigaWorld?
>	"Workbench 2.0 (formally known as Workbench 1.4) is set 
>	 for early 1990 release?"

I guess that is why they call it the APRIL issue huh? (As in April
first, as in April Fools Day) If it took C/A 12 months to get 1.3
out after it was at "Gamma" I can hardly see how they would get 1.4
out which is supposedly a much more radical change in less time.

--Chuck McManis
uucp: {anywhere}!sun!cmcmanis   BIX: cmcmanis  Internet: cmcmanis@Eng.Sun.COM
These opinions are my own and no one elses, but you knew that didn't you.
"If it didn't have bones in it, it wouldn't be crunchy now would it?!"