Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!texbell!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: (Alleged) SKsh deficiencies (Whineing) Message-ID: <5258@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: 7 Mar 90 11:28:56 GMT References: <13920054@hpfelg.HP.COM> <8648@pogo.WV.TEK.COM> Reply-To: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston Lines: 19 In article <8648@pogo.WV.TEK.COM> bluneski@pogo.WV.TEK.COM (Bob Luneski) writes: > Geeze, Deven. You seem on a personal vendetta to destroy SKsh. Not very > responsible net behavior... I think that's a bit harsh, but perhaps Deven could have taken that stuff to email. I think it's a bit much to expect a 20K executable for a decent KSH clone, but by avoiding the UNIX-compatibility stuff it should be possible to get it a *bit* smaller than it is now. You really can't run SKSH on a 512K Amiga, for example... I await tiny-sksh. > Or the intellegence.... It's said that those that can, do. And those that > can't claim they can. Now this was uncalled for. -- _--_|\ Peter da Silva . / \ \_.--._/ I haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on tape somewhere! v "Have you hugged your wolf today?" `-_-'