Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!decwrl!ucbvax!hplabs!hp-pcd!hpcvca!charles
From: charles@hpcvca.CV.HP.COM (Charles Brown)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Amiga Resource tracking & Protection.
Message-ID: <1410044@hpcvca.CV.HP.COM>
Date: 12 Mar 90 00:42:32 GMT
References: <208.25f3c82b@waikato.ac.nz>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Co., Corvallis, Oregon
Lines: 15

> If you guys want to give Commodore the mandate to go ahead and drop
> backwards compatibility completely for the sake of memory protection,
> then go ahead and say so, but keep in mind that the above two points
> are the Gospell truth.
>	Valentin

I am in favor of this.  There will be a period of pain, but in the end
the Amiga will become a much more robust computer.

Rather than calling it 1.4 or 1.5, your should probably call it 2.0
since it will not be compatible.
--
	Charles Brown	charles@cv.hp.com or charles%hpcvca@hplabs.hp.com
			or hplabs!hpcvca!charles or "Hey you!"
	Not representing my employer.