Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cimshop!davidm From: cimshop!davidm@uunet.UU.NET (David S. Masterson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Amiga Resource tracking & Protection. Message-ID: Date: 13 Mar 90 18:32:03 GMT References: <208.25f3c82b@waikato.ac.nz> <1410044@hpcvca.CV.HP.COM> <1990Mar12.071759.10106@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <134@caslon.cs.arizona.edu> Sender: davidm@cimshop.UUCP Organization: Consilium Inc., Mountain View, California. Lines: 21 In-reply-to: dave@cs.arizona.edu's message of 12 Mar 90 19:32:44 GMT In article <134@caslon.cs.arizona.edu> dave@cs.arizona.edu (David P. Schaumann) writes: In article <1990Mar12.071759.10106@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) writes: > MOST amiga owners don't want memory protection. Not me!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Then suggest how it could be done without killing everything already done on the Amiga. Suggest a standard by which it could be achieved. If the standard takes hold, then all you have to do is get hardware/software that conforms to the standard while all those who don't care can continue on as they were. -- =================================================================== David Masterson Consilium, Inc. uunet!cimshop!davidm Mt. View, CA 94043 =================================================================== "If someone thinks they know what I said, then I didn't say it!"